Perspective

Voting Machine, Weighing Machine

By Kyle Harrison

Updated

April 20, 2024

Reading Time

3 min

Warren Buffett is famous for quoting his long-time mentor, Ben Graham, as saying, "In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run it is a weighing machine.” In other words? In the short term, a company’s value can be determined by hype. In the long term, a company’s value is determined by business fundamentals. The same is true of startup valuations.

Often, private company valuations can represent a pulse on different hype cycles. During COVID, Hopin demonstrated a remarkable rise and fall that followed lockdown-induced commitment to virtual events, and their disappearance as soon as quarantine restrictions were lifted. From a high of $7.7 billion to a low of being bought by RingCentral for ~$15 million in cash.

Valuation reckoning has come for any number of businesses as many have struggled to live up to the 2020/2021 hype. Whether its public companies, like Robinhood, Uipath, or Twilio that saw their valuations fall from a high of $58 billion, $44 billion, and $70 billion respectively to market caps today of $11 billion, $14 billion, and $13 billion. And don’t even get started going down the rabbit hole on SPAC performance from that period. Then you have companies like Lacework, who, after having previously raised $1.9 billion in total funding, most recently at a valuation of $8.3 billion, but is now reportedly in talks to be acquired by competitor Wiz for “just $150 million to $200 million.”

Some would say these are macro trends, and every company is suffering if it isn’t within the bright hype spotlight of AI. But then you see examples like Ramp, or Rippling. Ramp, after raising at a 28% down round in August 2023, the company recently raised another round at $7.65 billion, nearly to its previous high. Rippling is reportedly in talks to raise $200 million in funding at a $13.5 billion valuation, up from $11.5 billion last year. Not every company is suffering when it comes to valuation.

Despite the high watermarks, its important to emphasize that no company is out of the woods just because they raise at a high valuation. Take Rippling, and the broader HR space as an example. With Rippling’s $13.5 billion valuation and Gusto’s last mark at $9.5 billion, there’s no shortage of highly valued companies in the space. Everyone is chasing the 900-pound gorilla in the space; ADP at ~$100 billion market cap.

While companies like Rippling and Gusto reportedly generated revenue of $350 million and $500 million respectively in 2023 or so, a similar company like Paylocity is valued at a market cap of $8.9 billion while generating $1.3 billion in 2023 revenue. Granted, Paylocity is growing ~30% year-over-year, while Rippling and Gusto are likely growing much faster, and pitching much bigger potential visions.

But the question remains for every company; in the long run, as the market becomes a weighing machine, will the company’s fundamentals and product expansion and market penetration be enough to justify the previous valuations they’ve raised at? Or will they fail to measure up?

Important Disclosures

This material has been distributed solely for informational and educational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy any security or to participate in any trading strategy. All material presented is compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but accuracy, adequacy, or completeness cannot be guaranteed, and Contrary LLC (Contrary LLC, together with its affiliates, “Contrary”) makes no representation as to its accuracy, adequacy, or completeness.

The information herein is based on Contrary beliefs, as well as certain assumptions regarding future events based on information available to Contrary on a formal and informal basis as of the date of this publication. The material may include projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets or expectations. Past performance of a company is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein will be realized. Actual experience may not reflect all of these opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary.

Contrary shall have no responsibility for: (i) determining that any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein is suitable for any particular reader; (ii) monitoring whether any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein continues to be suitable for any reader; or (iii) tailoring any opinions, forecasts, projections, risk assumptions, or commentary discussed herein to any particular reader’s objectives, guidelines, or restrictions. Receipt of this material does not, by itself, imply that Contrary has an advisory agreement, oral or otherwise, with any reader.

Contrary is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The registration of Contrary in no way implies a certain level of skill or expertise or that the SEC has endorsed Contrary. Investment decisions for Contrary clients are made by Contrary. Please note that, although Contrary manages assets on behalf of Contrary clients, Contrary clients may take any position (whether positive or negative) with respect to the company described in this material. The information provided in this material does not represent any investment strategy that Contrary manages on behalf of, or recommends to, its clients.

Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, company or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this material, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Investors should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security of the company discussed in this presentation.

Please see www.contrary.com/legal for additional important information.

Authors

Kyle Harrison

General Partner @ Contrary

Kyle leads Contrary’s investing efforts for companies from seed to scale. He’s previously worked at firms like Index and Coatue investing in companies like Databricks, Snowflake, Snyk, Plaid, Toast, and Persona.

See articles

© 2026 Contrary Research · All rights reserved

Privacy Policy

By navigating this website you agree to our privacy policy.